Considering the findings of Karen Yeung or the article by Jimmy Carter on voters needing a digital defense, what devices or procedures should be implemented today to insure the scrutiny of citizens, and in a lesser extent of consumers, over the compliance of algorithms with existing rules and laws?

As pointed out by Ms O’Neil in weapons of math destruction, some criteria used in US juridic algorithms used to determine prison sentencing are illegal but not contested due to the opacity of used algorithms.

To assure social justice, who should be involved in this procedure?

Add a Comment